EXCLUSIVE REPORT: Lauren Boebert’s Million-Dollar Shell Game
Her husband’s oil-and-gas income appeared once. Then the dollar amounts vanished, the company names changed, and a family-linked LLC quietly appeared in the middle of it all.
Lauren Boebert has built an entire political career around law and order and has substantially lined her own pockets in the process.
She wants the law enforced against immigrants, teachers, librarians, prosecutors, political opponents, and anyone else who irritated her before breakfast.
But when the law requires Lauren Boebert to explain her own family’s money, “law and order” begins to look less like a principle and more like a bumper sticker.
Nearly $1 million in consulting income appeared on one financial disclosure.
Then the exact amounts disappeared.
The name of the company changed.
Another LLC, personally formed by Lauren Boebert, appeared in the corporate chain.
Official county records continued placing her husband directly inside active drilling operations.
The congressional guardrails responded with the institutional equivalent of staring at their shoes.
This is not a minor bookkeeping dispute.
This is a story about money, political power, oil and gas, federal disclosure requirements, and a member of Congress who appears to believe transparency is something other people should practice.
The $938,987 That Appeared Once
Nearly half a million dollars a year
Lauren Boebert’s first congressional financial disclosure reported that her husband, Jayson Boebert, received:
$478,386 in 2020
$460,601 in 2019
That totals $938,987 in two years for what the filing described as “consulting services.”
The reported source was Terra Energy Productions.
The same disclosure identified Lauren Boebert’s 100 percent interest in Shooters Grill LLC and listed her position as proprietor and member of that company.
That is not side-hustle money.
That is not somebody earning a few dollars advising a neighbor about where to put a septic tank.
That is almost half a million dollars a year.
Most Americans would be delighted to have a consulting business that generated that kind of money without ever having to explain what the consultant actually did.
Which Terra company was it?
The federal disclosure names Terra Energy Productions.
But the operational records we reviewed repeatedly use different names:
Terra Energy Partners
TEP Rocky Mountain LLC
Boebert Consulting LLC
A recorded corporate document identifies Terra Energy Partners LLC as the sole member of TEP Rocky Mountain LLC. Garfield County records identify TEP Rocky Mountain as the drilling operator.
The precise company named on Boebert’s federal filing does not match the entities appearing throughout the drilling documents.
Perhaps “Terra Energy Productions” was a mistake.
Perhaps it was an informal name.
Perhaps someone preparing a federal financial disclosure involving almost $1 million simply shrugged and typed whatever sounded close enough.
That is not an acceptable explanation.
Boebert certified that the statements in her report were true, complete, and correct to the best of her knowledge and belief.
When the amount is nearly $1 million, “close enough” is not an accounting standard.
It is a warning sign.
Then the Numbers Disappeared
Welcome to the land of N/A
Boebert’s next annual disclosure no longer identified a Terra company as the source.
Instead, it listed:
Boebert Consulting LLC
Spouse, Consulting Services
Amount: N/A
The filing continued to list Boebert’s position with Shooters Grill LLC. It listed no position with Boebert Consulting LLC and no position with JLB903 LLC.
Her 2022 report repeated the pattern:
Boebert Consulting LLC
Spouse Salary
Amount: N/A
That report again disclosed her position with Shooters Grill and nothing involving JLB903 or Boebert Consulting.
Her 2023 report once again listed Boebert Consulting as the source of her husband’s salary, again showed the amount as N/A, and listed no outside positions at all.
Apparently, in Boebert accounting, N/A stands for Not Answering.
The amount may not have been required, but the retreat matters
Federal law generally requires disclosure of the source of a spouse’s earned income above the applicable threshold. The statute permits more limited reporting of a spouse’s income from personal services or self-employment in certain circumstances. (US Code)
So the use of N/A does not, standing alone, prove a violation.
But it tells us something important about Boebert’s approach to transparency.
When she first filed, the public received exact dollar figures.
Once those figures generated scrutiny, the public received the minimum.
The money went from $938,987 to N/A.
The disclosure did not become clearer.
It became foggier.
The Drilling Work Did Not Disappear
Official records kept naming Jayson Boebert
While Boebert’s congressional reports became less informative, Garfield County records remained surprisingly helpful.
A 2018 application for temporary employee housing at a TEP Rocky Mountain operation listed Jayson Boebert as a 24-hour emergency contact.
A December 2020 application at another TEP Rocky Mountain site again listed him as a 24-hour emergency contact.
A September 2021 application did the same.
The accompanying site plan identified him plainly:
Jayson Boebert: Drilling
The same emergency-contact list separately identified a drilling and completions manager, another drilling contact, a safety contact, and a spill-response contact.
Jayson was not listed as “former consultant,” “family friend,” or “guy who happened to answer the phone.”
He was listed under Drilling.
A September 24, 2021, rig-move notification stated that TEP Rocky Mountain had commenced drilling operations expected to continue for approximately 54 days. Jayson Boebert was copied alongside TEP personnel involved in drilling, engineering, safety, and operations.
Then, in January 2023, another Garfield County application named Jayson as a 24-hour emergency contact for a TEP Rocky Mountain project expected to remain active for 127 days.
The work remained visible. The compensation became invisible.
These county records do not tell us how much Jayson was paid after 2020.
That is precisely the problem.
The records continued to place him inside Terra-linked drilling operations.
The congressional reports continued identifying Boebert Consulting as the source of his income.
But the public was no longer told how much money was coming in.
The work remained visible.
The compensation disappeared behind N/A.
It is an impressive trick.
David Copperfield usually requires lighting, smoke, and a very expensive theater.
Congress apparently requires a PDF.
Now Meet JLB903 LLC
Lauren Boebert personally formed it
Colorado records show that Lauren Boebert personally formed JLB903 LLC on January 29, 2018.
The articles of organization identify:
JLB903 LLC at the Boebert family address
Lauren O. Boebert as its initial registered agent
Lauren O. Boebert as the person forming the company
Lauren O. Boebert as the person causing the document to be filed
The filing states that management was vested in one or more managers and that the company had at least one member.
It does not identify the manager.
It does not identify the member.
But Lauren Boebert is the only individual named throughout the formation filing.
That is considerably more involvement than accidentally walking past an LLC at the grocery store.
JLB903 then appears inside Boebert Consulting’s structure
The Colorado business record for Boebert Consulting identifies JLB903 LLC as its registered agent.
It uses the same Panoramic Drive address connected to the Boeberts.
That creates a direct documentary chain:
Lauren Boebert formed JLB903 LLC.
Lauren Boebert served as its initial registered agent.
JLB903 became the registered agent for Boebert Consulting LLC.
Boebert Consulting became the disclosed source of Jayson Boebert’s income.
Colorado’s Secretary of State explains that a registered agent receives official documents and service of process for a company. The state’s filing instructions also make clear that a registered agent is not necessarily an owner or director. (Colorado Secretary of State)
Registered-agent status alone does not settle the ownership question.
It raises it.
Who owned JLB903?
Who managed it?
Why did Lauren form it?
Why did it become the registered agent for the company listed as the source of her husband’s income?
This is an LLC inside the orbit of another LLC, connected to income originally attributed to a differently named energy company.
It is less a corporate structure than a Russian nesting doll designed by an accountant with trust issues.
She Knew How to Disclose an LLC
Shooters Grill made the form. JLB903 did not.
Boebert’s original disclosure identified her 100 percent ownership of Shooters Grill.
It listed the company as an asset.
It listed its estimated value.
It listed its losses.
It identified her as a proprietor and member of the LLC.
She clearly understood that LLC ownership and LLC positions could belong on a congressional financial disclosure.
But JLB903 did not appear.
Boebert Consulting did not appear as a position she held.
Her role in forming JLB903 was not explained.
JLB903’s relationship with Boebert Consulting was not explained.
The relationship among Boebert Consulting, Terra Energy Partners, and TEP Rocky Mountain was not explained.
The source named “Terra Energy Productions” was not reconciled with the companies appearing in the operational records.
The form had room for her husband’s retirement accounts, Robinhood activity, cryptocurrency trades, and restaurant interests.
It apparently ran out of space just before reaching the LLC Lauren personally created.
What unfortunate timing.
What Boebert Will Say
Let us save everyone some time
Lauren Boebert and her lawyers will probably say this is all perfectly innocent.
They may say registered-agent status does not prove ownership.
Correct.
They may say Lauren merely formed JLB903 as an administrative convenience, had no financial interest in it, never managed it, and received no benefit from it.
Possible.
They may say “Terra Energy Productions” was simply a clerical error and everyone understood that the disclosure referred to a Terra-related company.
Also possible.
They may say House rules did not require disclosure of the exact amount of her husband’s later ordinary earned income.
That may explain N/A.
They may say Boebert Consulting belonged solely to Jayson and that Lauren had no ownership, management authority, signing authority, or entitlement to distributions.
Fine.
They may say the House Ethics Committee reviewed her reports and did not object.
That would not prove the filings were complete. It would prove the congressional ethics system did not publicly pursue the questions now visible in the documents.
Then there is the traditional political defense:
This is a partisan witch hunt.
Naturally.
When documents raise questions about a politician’s money, the documents apparently register to vote.
She can clear it up immediately
None of these defenses requires months of investigation.
Lauren Boebert could resolve the central questions today.
She does not need another press release.
She does not need a fundraising email about the radical left.
She does not need to pose with a firearm next to a copy of the Constitution.
She needs to release the documents:
The operating agreements for JLB903 and Boebert Consulting
The complete ownership histories of both companies
Documents identifying their members and managers
Amendments, transfers, resignations, or changes in control
Contracts involving Jayson Boebert, Boebert Consulting, Terra Energy Partners, TEP Rocky Mountain, or affiliated entities
Invoices and payment records supporting the consulting income
K-1s or other records identifying company income and distributions
Bank-signature records showing who controlled the accounts
Any explanation submitted to House Ethics concerning “Terra Energy Productions”
Any amendment correcting or clarifying the identity of the payer
The missing documents are the ones that would reveal ownership, control, payment flow, and whether Lauren had a reportable position or interest.
Come on MUCK YOU!
Lauren Boebert is formally invited to appear on MUCK YOU!
Live or recorded.
She may bring a lawyer, an accountant, a spokesperson, or all three.
She can bring every document she believes proves our conclusions wrong.
She can explain:
What services Jayson performed for nearly $1 million
Which company actually paid the money
Why the federal disclosure named “Terra Energy Productions”
Why later filings named Boebert Consulting
Who owned and managed Boebert Consulting
Who owned and managed JLB903
Why Lauren created JLB903
Why JLB903 became Boebert Consulting’s registered agent
Whether Lauren had signing authority or received a financial benefit
Why neither company appeared among her disclosed positions
Whether she has amended, or intends to amend, any report
No ambush.
No edited clips designed to change her answers.
No campaign-rally audience.
Just the documents, the questions, and her explanation.
Come on MUCK YOU!, Congresswoman.
Defend the filings.
Explain the companies.
Show us the ownership records.
Follow the money with us.
Silence is also an answer
Boebert does not have to accept the invitation.
She does not have to release the operating agreements, contracts, invoices, ownership schedules, or bank-control records voluntarily.
She can continue calling every investigation political.
She can continue pretending that N/A resolves nearly $1 million in unanswered questions.
But she cannot credibly claim that the truth is complicated while refusing to release the documents that would make it simple.
If she had no ownership interest, show us.
If she was never a manager, show us.
If JLB903 had no financial connection beyond serving as registered agent, show us.
If “Terra Energy Productions” was an innocent mistake, identify the actual payer and release the contract.
If every disclosure was complete and accurate, come explain it under questioning.
The fastest way to end a supposed witch hunt is to produce the records proving there was no witch.
Until then, the questions remain.
So does our invitation.
AN OPEN INVITATION TO LAUREN BOEBERT
Appear on MUCK YOU! and explain the disclosures, the companies, the ownership structure, and the payment trail.
Bring counsel.
Bring an accountant.
Bring the documents.
No slogans. No fundraising appeal. Just answers.
What the Law Requires
These are legal filings, not campaign biographies
The Ethics in Government Act requires annual financial disclosures to include a “full and complete statement” of the information specified by law. The required categories include reportable income, certain property interests, liabilities, transactions, and positions held with outside businesses. (US Code)
The House Ethics Committee’s current Financial Disclosure Instruction Guide explains the detailed reporting obligations for members and other House filers. (House Committee on Ethics)
That makes the unanswered questions about JLB903 central to this story.
Was Lauren Boebert a member?
If she owned a membership interest, was it reportable as an asset or outside position?
Was she a manager?
If she functioned as a manager, was that a reportable position?
Did JLB903 own or control any interest in Boebert Consulting?
If so, did Lauren have a direct or indirect financial interest?
Did she have account authority or receive a benefit?
Who signed checks?
Who controlled the accounts?
Who received distributions?
Who reported the income for tax purposes?
These questions cannot be answered by another cable-news interview.
They require operating agreements, ownership schedules, tax documents, contracts, invoices, bank records, and payment records.
In other words, documents.
Lauren Boebert’s natural predator.
The Laws We Are Examining
5 U.S.C. § 13104
This is the core federal financial-disclosure statute.
It requires a full and complete statement covering the categories specified by Congress, including reportable income and certain outside positions and interests. (US Code)
The central question is whether Boebert had any reportable position, ownership interest, financial interest, or functional role in JLB903 or Boebert Consulting that was omitted.
5 U.S.C. § 13106
Federal law authorizes civil action against an individual who knowingly and willfully falsifies, fails to file, or fails to report information required under the financial-disclosure law.
The statute also contains criminal provisions for knowing and willful falsification or failure to report required information. It directs a supervising ethics office to refer a matter to the attorney general when it has reasonable cause to believe a willful violation occurred. (US Code)
Not “may consider.”
Not “might discuss after the next recess.”
The statute uses mandatory language.
Congress occasionally writes strong verbs into laws.
The challenge is locating someone willing to read them.
18 U.S.C. § 1001
Depending on the evidence and the filing involved, the federal false-statements statute may also warrant examination.
It prohibits knowing and willful concealment of a material fact, materially false statements, and the use of materially false documents in covered federal matters.
For legislative-branch matters, its reach includes certain documents required by law, rule, or regulation to be submitted to Congress or a legislative-branch office, as well as authorized congressional investigations and reviews. (US Code)
Whether that statute applies here depends on evidence of intent, materiality, and the precise nature of any omission or false statement.
That is why we need the records.
House Rules XXIII and XXVI
The current Rules of the House contain the Code of Official Conduct in Rule XXIII and financial-disclosure provisions in Rule XXVI. (Rules Committee)
The spirit of disclosure is not difficult to understand:
Tell the public what you own.
Tell the public which businesses you manage.
Tell the public where your money comes from.
Do not turn a federal disclosure into a scavenger hunt involving county drilling permits, family LLCs, and several variations of the word Terra.
Where Were the Guardrails?
Congress policing Congress
The House Committee on Ethics may review allegations that a current member violated the Code of Official Conduct or other applicable laws, rules, or regulations. (House Committee on Ethics)
So where was it?
Did the committee ask why nearly $1 million was attributed to “Terra Energy Productions” when the operational records identify Terra Energy Partners and TEP Rocky Mountain?
Did it ask why the source later changed to Boebert Consulting?
Did it ask who owned Boebert Consulting?
Did it identify JLB903?
Did it obtain JLB903’s operating agreement?
Did it determine whether Lauren was a member or manager?
Did it compare the federal disclosures with Garfield County drilling records?
Did anyone follow the money?
The public has no reason to believe these basic questions were meaningfully answered.
Congress created an ethics system in which members file their own reports, their colleagues oversee compliance, and much of the process happens outside public view.
That is not a guardrail.
That is an honor system for people who hire consultants to explain why the honor system technically does not apply to them.
We Are Exploring Every Avenue for Accountability
House Committee on Ethics
American Muckrakers is reviewing the evidence for potential submission to the House Committee on Ethics.
The committee accepts information alleging that a current House member, officer, or employee violated the Code of Official Conduct or another applicable rule, law, or regulation. (House Committee on Ethics)
Any submission should ask the committee to determine:
Whether Lauren Boebert held an ownership interest in JLB903.
Whether she served as a manager, member, officer, or proprietor of JLB903.
Whether she held any direct or indirect interest in Boebert Consulting.
Whether JLB903 owned, controlled, or received payments from Boebert Consulting.
Whether “Terra Energy Productions” accurately identified the source of the reported income.
Whether required positions, assets, or income sources were omitted.
Whether any omission or misstatement was knowing, willful, and material.
Office of Congressional Ethics
We are also examining submission to the Office of Congressional Ethics.
OCE describes itself as an independent, nonpartisan entity that reviews allegations involving House members, officers, and staff and may refer appropriate matters to the House Committee on Ethics. (Office of Congressional Conduct)
Department of Justice
If the evidence supports a knowing and willful violation, federal law provides for potential referral to the attorney general.
The Justice Department’s Public Integrity Section oversees investigations and prosecutions involving federal crimes affecting government integrity, including sensitive cases involving elected and appointed officials. (Department of Justice)
The records we intend to pursue
We are examining lawful methods of obtaining or confirming:
Operating agreements
Membership and ownership records
Manager designations
Consulting contracts
Invoices
Payment records
K-1 forms and other tax records
Bank-signature and account-control documents
Communications concerning preparation of the disclosures
Any amendments or explanations submitted to House Ethics
We will follow the records wherever they lead.
Even if they lead through enough LLCs to qualify for a frequent-filer discount at the Colorado Secretary of State’s office.
The Law of the Land Is Not a Campaign Prop
Lauren Boebert has spent years demanding accountability from everyone else.
She lectures Americans about personal responsibility.
She calls for investigations of political opponents.
She treats allegations against others as established fact before the first document has been read.
But when the questions involve her own household income, her own federal disclosures, her own LLC formation, and her own connection to a business tied to her husband’s consulting income, the public is expected to accept ambiguity.
The company names do not match.
The dollar amounts vanish.
The family-linked LLC is not explained.
The drilling records continue.
The ethics system sleeps.
That is what a two-tiered system looks like.
For ordinary Americans, incorrect paperwork can mean penalties, liens, audits, lost benefits, court hearings, or worse.
For members of Congress, it can apparently mean correcting the form later, assuming anyone bothers to ask.
Lauren Boebert says nobody is above the law.
Good.
We agree.
Now we are going to test that proposition on her.
What Comes Next
We are continuing to obtain documents, map the corporate relationships, identify the payment chain, and evaluate formal accountability actions.
This story is not finished.
It has barely cleared the well pad.
The law is not a slogan.
The Constitution is not a costume.
Financial disclosure is not optional.
And N/A is not an answer.
Oh, final word: Boebert never sued us. We sued her and partially won that federal lawsuit thanks to Dan Ernst, an expert in 1st Amendment law and an attorney in Denver.
About the Author
David B. Wheeler is the President and Co-Founder of American Muckrakers, a rabid watchdog organization focused on accountability, ethics, and rule-of-law enforcement. He is also the host of the MUCK YOU! podcast, which features candid conversations with public figures. Wheeler cut his teeth on campaigns in Iowa, was elected to the Young Democrats National Committee in 1776, produced the first marathon on Antarctica, lowered the level of the Mississippi River once for Burlington, Iowa Mayor Elaine Baxter, and began fatherhood of three kids at age 45. He has run for public office in a deep-red county in Western North Carolina. He is clearly a glutton for pain. But, he lost 50 pounds in a year too.
Disclaimer
First Amendment-protected commentary. This article is not a pleading or affidavit and is not intended to influence any pending proceeding. All rights reserved. Paid for by American Muckrakers PAC II. Contributions are not tax-deductible.
Sources and Primary Documents
Congressional Financial Disclosures
Lauren Boebert New Filer Report, Filing Year 2020
Filing ID #10043518, filed August 17, 2021
This report identifies “Terra Energy Productions” as the source of Jayson Boebert’s consulting income and reports $478,386 for 2020 and $460,601 for 2019.
It also discloses Lauren Boebert’s 100 percent interest in Shooters Grill LLC, identifies her as a proprietor and member, and contains her certification that the filing was true, complete, and correct to the best of her knowledge and belief.
Lauren Boebert Annual Report, Filing Year 2021
Filing ID #10050195, filed August 13, 2022
This report changes the listed source of Jayson Boebert’s income to Boebert Consulting LLC, describes the income as spousal consulting services, and reports the amount as N/A.
It lists Shooters Grill as Lauren Boebert’s outside LLC position but does not list JLB903 or Boebert Consulting.
Lauren Boebert Annual Report, Filing Year 2022
Filing ID #10053834, filed May 11, 2023
This report lists Boebert Consulting LLC, Spouse Salary, N/A.
It continues to identify Shooters Grill as Boebert’s outside LLC position and does not list JLB903 or Boebert Consulting as positions held by her.
Lauren Boebert Annual Report, Filing Year 2023
Filing ID #10061648, filed August 13, 2024
This report again lists Boebert Consulting LLC, Spouse Salary, N/A.
Schedule E reports no outside positions.
Colorado Corporate Records
JLB903 LLC Articles of Organization
Colorado entity ID #20181087585, filed January 29, 2018
The filing identifies Lauren O. Boebert as the initial registered agent, the person forming the LLC, and the individual causing the filing to be delivered.
It uses the Panoramic Drive address, states that management is vested in one or more managers, and confirms that the company had at least one member.
The filing does not identify the manager or member.
Boebert Consulting LLC
Colorado entity ID #20121008968
The state business record identifies JLB903 LLC as Boebert Consulting’s registered agent, uses the Panoramic Drive address, reports a formation date of January 4, 2012, and lists the company as delinquent beginning January 1, 2024.
Colorado’s official business database allows searches by company name, entity identification number, and document number. (Colorado Secretary of State)
Colorado Registered-Agent Guidance
The Colorado Secretary of State describes a registered agent as the official point of contact for receiving service of process and state documents.
State filing instructions specify that a registered agent is not necessarily an owner or director. (Colorado Secretary of State)
Garfield County and TEP Operational Records
2018 Temporary Employee Housing Application
The application identifies TEP Rocky Mountain LLC as the operator and lists Jayson Boebert as a 24-hour emergency contact.
2020 Temporary Employee Housing Application
The application identifies TEP Rocky Mountain as the operator’s compliance officer and lists Jayson Boebert as a 24-hour emergency contact.
GR 12-29 Drilling and Employee-Housing Records, September 2021
The site plan identifies TEP Rocky Mountain LLC as the applicant and lists:
Jayson Boebert: Drilling
It separately identifies a drilling and completions manager, another drilling contact, safety personnel, and a spill-response contact.
The September 24, 2021, rig-move notification states that TEP Rocky Mountain had begun drilling operations expected to continue for approximately 54 days. Jayson Boebert was included among the recipients copied on the notice.
Honea 19-05 Drilling Records, January 2023
The application identifies TEP Rocky Mountain LLC and lists Jayson Boebert as a 24-hour emergency contact for a project expected to remain at the location for 127 days.
Terra Energy Partners and TEP Rocky Mountain
A recorded document contained in the Garfield County records identifies Terra Energy Partners LLC as the sole member of TEP Rocky Mountain LLC.
Federal Financial-Disclosure Law
5 U.S.C. § 13104
This statute governs the contents of federal financial-disclosure reports and requires annual filings to include a full and complete statement covering the information specified by Congress. (US Code)
5 U.S.C. § 13106
This statute addresses knowingly and willfully false financial disclosures and knowing and willful failures to report required information.
It authorizes civil enforcement, contains potential criminal consequences, and provides for referral to the attorney general when the statutory standard is met. (US Code)
18 U.S.C. § 1001
This statute prohibits knowing and willful concealment of material facts, materially false statements, and the use of materially false documents in covered federal matters.
Its legislative-branch provisions include certain documents required by law, rule, or regulation to be submitted to Congress or a legislative-branch office. (US Code)
House Disclosure and Ethics Rules
House Committee on Ethics Financial Disclosure Overview
The House Ethics Committee states that the Ethics in Government Act requires members, officers, specified employees, and candidates to file financial-disclosure reports with the Clerk of the House. (House Committee on Ethics)
House Financial Disclosure Instruction Guide
The committee publishes the official instructions governing what must be reported and how the schedules should be completed. (House Committee on Ethics)
Rules of the House of Representatives, 119th Congress
Rule XXIII contains the Code of Official Conduct.
Rule XXVI addresses financial disclosure. (Rules Committee)
House Committee on Ethics Complaint Process
The committee may review allegations that a current House member, officer, or employee violated the Code of Official Conduct or another applicable rule, law, or regulation. (House Committee on Ethics)
Additional Accountability Authorities
Office of Congressional Ethics
OCE is an independent, nonpartisan entity charged with reviewing allegations involving House members, officers, and staff and referring appropriate matters to the House Committee on Ethics. (Office of Congressional Conduct)
Department of Justice Public Integrity Section
The Public Integrity Section oversees federal investigations and prosecutions involving crimes affecting government integrity, including sensitive public-corruption matters involving elected and appointed officials. (Department of Justice)
Source Note
The congressional disclosures, Colorado corporate filings, and Garfield County documents cited in this report are public records.
Screenshots and document excerpts should be captioned with the filing number, date, issuing agency, and page number whenever possible.
Federal statutes and current House guidance were checked against official government sources in July 2026.